Which material is acceptable for corner markers in boundary surveys?

Prepare for the DMC Administrative Order Test No. 2007-29. Use flashcards, interactive quizzes, and detailed explanations for each question to enhance your understanding. Master the content with our comprehensive practice material and succeed!

Multiple Choice

Which material is acceptable for corner markers in boundary surveys?

Explanation:
Corner markers must endure years of exposure and potential disturbance, so the material used needs to resist decay, termites, and damage. The standard specifies durable hardwoods—narra, ipil, molave, yacal, or other similarly long-lasting woods—as acceptable for boundary corner markers because these species are dense and resilient, ensuring the monument stays legible and intact over time. Softer or less durable woods like pine or maple deteriorate more quickly in tropical conditions, and while oak is strong, it isn’t listed as an acceptable material in this requirement. Using the specified durable hardwoods provides a stable, long‑lasting reference for surveys and boundary records.

Corner markers must endure years of exposure and potential disturbance, so the material used needs to resist decay, termites, and damage. The standard specifies durable hardwoods—narra, ipil, molave, yacal, or other similarly long-lasting woods—as acceptable for boundary corner markers because these species are dense and resilient, ensuring the monument stays legible and intact over time. Softer or less durable woods like pine or maple deteriorate more quickly in tropical conditions, and while oak is strong, it isn’t listed as an acceptable material in this requirement. Using the specified durable hardwoods provides a stable, long‑lasting reference for surveys and boundary records.